靠逼视频,欧美亚洲日韩女优中文另类,亚洲av成熟,第六色无码精品

How to Choose MWCO Filters?

2024.04.10 12057


MWCO filters, also known as centrifugal filters, are commonly used lab ultrafiltration devices for the concentration, purification and buffer exchange of polynucleotides and protein samples. To select the appropriate ultrafiltration MWCO filters, we need to consider many factors, like the molecular weight(MW) and molecules composition of the sample, concentration, transmembrane pressure,etc.


But we generally recommend choosing an ultrafiltration membrane with a molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) that is 2-3 times smaller than the molecular weight of the target macromolecule that wants to be concentrated. Learn more about how to use centrifugal filters step by step by reading our blog.


Table of Contents

  1. Molecular Weight (MW)
    1. kDa vs Microns
  2. MWCO in Ultrafiltration
    1. Impact of Small MWCO Filters
    2. Impact of Large MWCO Filters
  3. Impacts Affect Interception in Ultrafiltration
    1. Sample concentration
    2. Molecules composition
    3. Transmembrane pressure
    4. Chemical compatibility
    5. pH and ionic conditions
    6. Temperature
  4. Conclusion


Molecular Weight (MW)

In microfiltration, the pore size of the membrane is usually measured in microns(range from 0.1 to 10μm), indicating that particles larger than this specification will be retained by the membrane.


For ultrafiltration membranes(range from 0.01 to 0.1μm ), they are categorized based on NMWL (Nominal Molecular Weight Limit) or MWCO (Molecular Weight Cut Off), which are in the unit of Daltons(Da) or KiloDalton (kDa). 1 kilodalton equals 1000 daltons.


kDa vs Microns

KiloDaltons(kDa) is a unit of measurement for molecular weight. An increase in the kDa of a molecule indicates a corresponding increase in the number of atoms within the molecule. On the other hand, a micrometer (micron or μm) is a measure of molecular length.


Although molecular weight and molecular length are related, there isn't a specific, fixed constant of proportionality between weight and length. This relationship varies due to multiple factors, including the protein's structure, compactness, and conformation in a solution. This means, an increase of atoms, which leads to an increase in kDa value, may still keep the same molecular diameter.


As a general guideline, 100 kDa typically corresponds to a particle radius of 10 nm (equals to 0.01 μm).


For a more precise assessment of a protein's size, techniques like dynamic light scattering (DLS) or size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) can be utilized as they directly measure the size distribution.


MWCO in Ultrafiltration

Molecular Weight Cut-Off (MWCO) is a term used in membrane filtration to describe the pore size or rejection capacity of an ultrafiltration membrane. An ultrafiltration membrane with defined MWCO indicates that 90% of the molecules above this value will be retained by the membrane. Ultrafiltration membrane manufacturers commonly produce MWCO's of 3kDa, 10kDa, 30kDa, 50kDa, 100kDa etc.

---wikipedia


However, various factors affect retention capabilities in ultrafiltration, we generally recommend choosing an ultrafiltration membrane with a molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) that is 2-3 times smaller than the molecular weight of the target macromolecule that wants to be concentrated. This choice ensures better results and the efficiency of the ultrafiltration process.


Filter MWCO Target MW
3 kDa 6 kDa < MW < 30 kDa
10 kDa 30 kDa < MW < 100 kDa
30 kDa 100 kDa < MW < 200 kDa
50 kDa200 kDa < MW <500 kDa
100 kDa MW > 500 kDa

Diagram: MWCO and Target MW


Want to learn how to calculate a DNA, RNA or Protein’s molecular weight(MW), Read this article: How to select the correct MWCO for DNA, RNA and protein purification and concentration.


Impact of Small MWCO Filters

Selecting an MWCO membrane that is too small may prolong the concentration process and reduce the flow rate. Additionally, a smaller MWCO filter might lead to protein precipitation due to the high protein concentration. Both excessively rapid or excessive concentrations can contribute to protein precipitation.


Impact of Large MWCO Filters

Conversely, opting for an MWCO that is too large will result in the membrane's surface intercepting more macromolecules and particles in the sample, leading to increased non-specific binding. To maximize yield, it is recommended to use a relatively smaller filter unit and membrane area. Cobetter Briscale centrifugal filters are made of low protein binding Regenerated Cellulose membranes, which featured a relatively high protein recovery rate. 


Impacts Affect Interception in Ultrafiltration

As mentioned above, various factors affect membrane retention capabilities and product recovery in ultrafiltration, including molecular conformations, charged properties, sample concentration and composition, operating conditions, and equipment configuration, etc. Here are some factors to take into consideration:


Sample concentration

Samples with concentrations below 1mg/mL will pass through more easily compared to those exceeding 10mg/mL. Furthermore, the presence of other molecules can increase sample concentrations as well.


Molecules composition

Globular proteins have higher rejection than flexible polymers with extended chains, such as polystyrene and dextran. This implies that linear molecules are more easily to pass through membrane pores compared to globular molecules.


Therefore, for approximately globular molecules, it is best to choose a centrifugal filter with MWCO equal to or slightly smaller than the molecular weight of the target molecule. This will shorten the centrifugation time, ensure the recovery rate simultaneously, and significantly reduce the risk of macromolecular damage.


Transmembrane pressure

High transmembrane pressure caused by G-force during the centrifugal process will increase molecule passage. On the contrary, reducing the g-force can enhance the membrane’s molecule retention capabilities.


Chemical compatibility

To prevent swelling or degradation that could impair membrane performance, it's essential for membranes to be chemically compatible with the feed solution.


pH and ionic conditions

pH change and ionic condition change may cause molecule conformational changes or aggregation.


Temperature

Lower temperatures can reduce molecule permeation through a membrane when compared to high-temperature conditions (4oC versus 24oC).


Conclusion

By carefully considering the MWCO of the ultrafiltration membrane, you can achieve optimal concentration, reduce protein precipitation, and enhance overall efficiency in your filtration process. When working with samples lacking a reference, it is recommended to initially test a centrifugal filter with a Molecular Weight Cut-Off (MWCO) that is 1/2 the molecular weight of your target molecule.


As so many factors affect the final result, it is crucial to conduct pilot experiments to validate membrane performance for a specific application. Cobetter Briscale? centrifugal filter units offer reliable performance and high protein recovery, making them an excellent choice for your ultrafiltration needs.


You may also be interested in

欧美色图片中文字幕| 东京热精品一区二区| 欧美日韩淫乱毛片| 一道欧美一区二区三区| 亚欧无码视频在线观看| 色品久| 欧美日韩一区二区精品人妖| 青春草视屏| 人妻偷拍网站| 夜夜 久久 综合| 少妇吃几把视频| 亚洲区二久久精品| 国产免费黄色污污污| 欧韩日一区二区一区| 久久久久久久胖女人黄色片一级| 大香蕉xxzz869xyz| 国产成人精品aⅴ无码毛片老师| 亚洲一区二区三区在线免费电影| av 成人 線上看| 欧美精选91| 久久蜜黄黄| 精品少妇24p| 国产美女成年人网站| 我想看免费的国产乱轮| 亚洲天堂成| 欧美色吊图| 偷拍中文字幕av| 一二区无日本一道本| 中文字幕av影视精品不卡| 久久肏| 欧美 日韩 国产 偷拍 自拍| 成成人Av网织| 日韩干p一区在线影院| 久久精品电影观看| 黄片91人妻欧美| 综合婷婷婷超清| 操美女骚逼播放| 久久中文人妻无码免费| 亚洲综合国产欧美暗网成人| 久久在线大香蕉| 成人插入亚洲|